Видео

What kind of snow blower is that? I need one like that to load my dump truck

I have been running the same set up for 5 seasons now. It’s okay for straight lines but doing roads with turns it is too cumbersome. Also have to be very careful with the suspension settings making sure you are in the furthest down position whilst blowing. Otherwise you can do damage to the PTO. I really like the float mode but the front 3 point doesn’t quite come up high enough in certain situations. Being able to go 40 mph from one plow location to another is nice. I wouldn’t recommend a fastrac for a snowblower unless you already have it on the farm. JCB parts and service is scarce also

For the money it's hard to beat a Schulte blower. That JCB really makes a great setup for this.

How do you think the Schulte compares to the rotary blowers like the Snocrete? Have you had any issue with shear pins?

Nice

I’ve been wanting a new tillage tool and I came across this and I can’t get over the fact the right side rolling basket broken in the video lol

Great burn, love it how you flatten the chimney .

What's a close estimate for price

What’s the horsepower requirement to pull a 16 row shank strip till tool bar

How much horsepower is required for a 16 row 30” bar

Everblade heated wipers are a must for any skidsteer blowing snow.

Nice setup!

So every single customer wanted markers yet nobody uses them? Thats gotta be a couple tons of dead weight and knowing Kinze probably $20,000 just for the "genius" that went into "designing" them. On a lead-sled big blue anchor like that in dirt like that where guys also apparently like "flotation" and high-horsepower track tractors just to pull 24-row drawn planters? Doesn't really add up but some people have more dollars than sense. Especially people that try to be corn farmers in the land of 10,000 lakes in the areas where a "dry year" is one where the "wetlands" dry all the way up to mud instead of standing water.

The old "park the loader halfway between the two main ingredients located 200 yards apart" instead of right next to the main ingredient you're going to load the most of and the most buckets of and therefore will have the most opportunity to spill" and will save the most time, money and wear and tear and waste making as short of trips to and from as possible theory of "ration mixing/feeding efficiency". But at least the "dry distillers grain" is remaining dry even though as "dry matter" its really not only more or less impossible for it to "spoil" but its better "feed" when its not sucking the moisture out of the cattle's mouths in addition to tasting like "sour mash". Which is why its so often used by smart cattlemen and ration "makers" who make sure every "sour" that goes into a ration has a "sweet" to go with it and every "dry" that goes in has a "wet". Its just a bonus that "molasses' can kill two birds with one stone for DDG. Of course anyone that decides a good time to demo a new loader mixing rations apparently without a clue or scale is a cold, wet shitty, windy day when clearly "chow time" is going to wait however long it takes to learn to "run" the new "loader" and that adds hay "by the bale" because apparently "mixer" and "grinder" are "close enough" and why not a little more dry, dull, dusty matter in a ration and who cares if its "mixed" and stays that way if they don't eat the shit until they're hungry enough to eat anything is probably not all that concerned about keeping cattle "on feed" when they're never really that way to begin with. And has no clue that when the weather is shitty and the cattle are burning more calories to stay warm and may go right from "low blood sugar" i.e "hungry" to "not hungry" in minutes as soon as they start burning fat which is why its essential to keep feed in front of them and a "sweet ration" with lots of "instant energy" and a minimum of dry matter they have to tank up on cold water to "wet" and "ruminate on" as RUMINANTS is the worst possible time to be late with feed and/or be fucking up a "guess and by god" ration using a new "loader" given that once they don't have feed in front of them when they're hungry and/or turn away from it and realize they don't have to eat to not be hungry, they'll never be "on feed" period much less even "on feed" to the extent they were before. And its always the "tail-enders" that are outsiders or outcasts mainly because they're always "running behind" the rest of the pen when it comes to size, weight, gain, energy level, getting hungry enough to eat crap, getting enough crap to eat before getting sick of eating crap etc and that KILL a pen's ADG and should be sorted off and hand-fed "candy" rations in pens too small for them to be too far away from the bunk at feeding time to resist and that will bounce back and catch up in no time if handled right or will fall further behind and will never "finish" if not that are hardest to get "on feed" and the easiest to get "off feed" when something is just a little "off" about what its in the bunk.

Looks like somebody started with a TLB with a sideshift hoe, split it in front of the cab, took the backhoe off the back, stuck the engine back there, n flipped shitcanned the boom of the hoe, hooked the extendable stick up where the boom was and then tipped it back 90 degrees and articulated it with leftover parts from the sideshift to the "clutch housing" of the rear end and took the front axle and cobbled it to the bottom of the front "frame". All to make a single-arm "payloader" wannabe about as handy to use as a "payloader" as a telehandler on way less stable and with crappy vision and half the lift height so it has basically none of the pros of a telehandler, TLB and wheel loader and all of the cons. Seriously, the only way a person could consider that an "improvement" over a telehandler for "loader work" is he or she was clueless enough to buy a telehandler primarily for "loader work". Telehandler is "agspeak" for "rough terrain forklift/material handler" like "payloader" is "agspeak" for "wheel loader" and "backhoe" is "agspeak" for TLB and "JCB" is "agspeak" for "shit nobody else builds because its not possible to replace specialized machines with multi-tasking mechanical abortions and sell them to exactly the kind of "operators" that no company with real agricultural/construction/commercial/forestry markets and machines and many many satisfied professional customers wants or needs as "customers" if they aren't smart enough to choose machines based on their intended primary purpose instead and being able to excel at that purpose while being "average at best" for others instead of picking machines based on which one is doing the most different things in the brochure". It just never occurs to some people that all the pictures and tasks in the brochure don't necessarily come from the same industry, business, jobsite, etc any more than it occurs to them that having four wheels, a cab, a diesel engine and a "loader bucket" does not make all "loaders" equal or that generally speaking, the more "permanently" the loader bucket is installed, the better that loader is for "loading" day in and day out. If you want a bulldozer, buy something with steel tracks or rubber tires or steel sheeps foot wheels with a dozer blade permanently attached. Don't buy a "dozer blade" and put it on a farm tractor and think the dozer blade is what makes a "bulldozer". And buy a "loader" for loading feed wagons with 10-foot "sides" you have to clear by at least two to three feet to "dump" the bucket which means you need about a 15 foot "dump height" to see what the hell you're doing mixing a ration that at least puts your "eye level" halfway up there so you can look up to the bucket while dumping without tilting your head back. In the long run, climbing up and down into and out of a real wheel loader cab is not only good exercise but it's a lot easier on your body than spending half your seat time looking "up" at something that's just as high above you sitting in the cab of a "loader" as it would be if you were standing on the ground the same distance back. Of course there are two magic words that make "operators" who buy telehandlers to be "payloaders" forget entirely the whole "seating position and height is important to visibility regardless of "dump height". "Self-leveling". Yeah. The problem is that "self-leveling" means dick for "loader work" involving buckets.

Track width of that "tractor" is supposed to be 7 feet. The cart total width is supposed to be about 13 feet on tracks. I doubt that includes the auger extended since the same cart with "flotation" tires has a width of 14 feet which sounds about right for a cart that big with tires that wide given a typical highway "lane" is around 12 feet from shoulder to center line. That cart should also overall length be as long as half of that tractor trailer give or take. There's no way that's a 1300 bushel cart behind that little part-time 4wd wannabe "farm tractor". I drug around a Kinze 1240 on flotation tires behind a JD 9300 for a few months and those carts make big tractors look small and small tractors look tiny. They also weigh empty more than that "tractor" weighs and on tracks they pull like big, blue anchors. Either that cart is smaller than what the specs say by a lot or that "high-speed" so-called "farm tractor" with a 43 mph max speed is way too wide to be "transporting" at those speeds even "empty" which of course is the only way its going to be allowed to do 43 mph just like other "commercial" wheeled "tractors" made for high-speed transport and to be able to be effectively and efficiently and "legally" driven where they cannot be hauled are only allowed to reach top speed in "transport" mode and within the maximum speed/weight ratings of their tires. Deere 4930 and 4940 "commercial applicators" have a 43 mph/35 km/h "empty" transport speed even with some solution in the tank because they're highest empty weights are with dry box spreaders on them. But put any product in one that compresses the suspension "too far" and they drop back to being "slow moving vehicles" because they lack mechanical steering and braking systems and have fuel and hydraulic oil capacities in excess of what a "vocational" commercial vehicle can transport without being placarded and MSDSed and DOT-numbered and "insured" and do not have DOT-approved fuel and/or hydraulic oil tanks. There's also no way those things have "310 PTO HP" at "either end" instead of "both ends combined" given that they're "standard" 540-rpm PTOs and they're kicking the engine speed up 400+ rpm to get a "1000 rpm" PTO speed from 1500-odd RPM. If that were a 175+ HP 1000-rpm PTO it would be 1 3/4" 1000 "standard" and would be rated at 2100-2200 engine rpm so it could spin 540 at 1250 engine rpm or so and have "half" its rated PTO horsepower at about half its engine rated horsepower and high-idle speed. Just like 150 hp is kind of the maximum "safe" PTO "POWER LEVEL" ONCE TORQUE-RISE IS FIGURED IN WITH A 1 3/8 SHAFT, 300 IS ABOUT THE LIMIT WITH AN 1 3/4 SHAFT DUE TO ANGULARITY AND DRIVELINE WEIGHT AND "CRITICAL SPEEDS". WHICH IS WHY BIG ROW-CROPS AND FOUR WHEEL DRIVES ARE "TORQUE LIMITED" WITH THE PTO ON AND THE TRACTOR IN MOTION AND WITHOUT A 600 HP PTO DYNO WITH A 3600 LB-FT. DRIVELINE YOU CAN'T "DYNO" THEM DOING A FULL TORQUE-RISE PULL AND THEY'RE RATED FOR FLYWHEEL GROSS HORSEPOWER WHICH WITH AN EFFICIENT AND WELL-ENGINEERED PTO DRIVETRAIN THEY SHOULD PRODUCE AT "PTO RATED SPEED" WHEN DOING A "TORQUE-RISE" PULL FROM HIGH IDLE TO RATED ENGINE SPEED TO PTO SPEED. THAT'S THE ONLY WAY TO GET "RATED HORSEPOWER" AT A SPECIFIC ENGINE AND/OR PTO SPEED. START AT HIGH IDLE AND "NO LOAD" AND LOAD THE PTO AND ENGINE UNTIL SPEEDS DROP TO RATED SPEEDS. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS HORSEPOWER WITHOUT TORQUE AND "SPEED" BUT TORQUE CAN EXIST WITHOUT SHAFT ROTATION AND "SPEED" RESULTING IN "0 HORSEPOWER" BECAUSE TORQUE IS FORCE AND ACTUAL "POWER" AND "HORSEPOWER" IS JUST A "RATE".

It may not be for everyone but it should at least be for whoever was playing farmer in the demo since he or she apparently has no idea how to plant a field and can't even turn around without overlapping 5+ feet. Kinda hard to be precise at 7 or 8 mph though. The set-up and predelivery guy might need some professional help too. I don't think there is a single row unit on the right side that centered between its neighbors and it looks like somebody tried to "build" it "backward" putting wheel modules and other big "important" parts on the toolbar first and hung the row units as close to proper spacing as they could "filling in the gaps". And probably from the outside in. You always find the centerline of the entire toolbar regardless of type and with it straight and level and reference everything to that. Hitch, row units etc. And you find the true centers of those working from the inside out. True centers being the center of the drawbar pin hole, center of the opening disk "V" etc. Not just the center of the mounting bracket or gusset plate or u-bolts. If a planter is engineered, constructed and set up correctly and is a simple mechanical-drive, mechanical spring-downpressure low-budget Deere "copy" with an air-seeder seed delivery system there shouldn't be a hell of a lot of "service" required until opener disks wear out, various "wheel bearings" wear out etc. Maybe metering unit work but thats a waste of time and money for the 5+ mph crowd and those that just as be using a no-till drill planting beans and end up with "twin-row" and "skip-row" corn" at the beginning and end of every pass and a "corn maze" in every "contoured" field.

Doing an good job. How fast are you running in the field and how much horse power?

Great footage, thanks for sharing!

did you buy the snow blower with the extention to load trucks. I and am wanting to buy one

Would a 335 horse 4wd row crop tractor pull this 60’ bar?

I have been looking at the Gravely ZT XL 42 and the HD 48. What is the width of the HD 48 with the chute down?

It's also offered in a 44".

what is the transport width with those litfed openers, please ?

Have you put many hours on it? My 52" is falling apart. Im documenting it in videos.

NOW THATS A REAL TILLAGE TOOL.

They will come back on this with beans and they plant the beans at a angle so the combine and pick them with the row for corn.

What was the idea behind going on an angle instead of between the row?

how are the 60 ft toolbars working out for you guys. currently using a semi mounted 12/16 combo with assist wheels that works great, but thinking maybe a 60ft foot might help out. the little Montag box won't work for our area,,too small & lots of 3 product VRT done here.

what do they have in the tank?

They dont want you to get a good look at it in the light, cobbled together

I want to see a tractor, not a bunch of disco lights. What's wrong, guys? Come on!